Page 66 - CFJ_Apr26
P. 66

ADVICE & INFORMATION



              A story of VAT, fitting services, and carpet sales

              Also relevant was that fitters set   from the customer, and then pays the   Separate the payment
              their own final prices, and United   fitter afterwards.               Never collect payment for the fitter. The
              Carpets never received any fitting fees.   In that case, the fitter is likely to be   customer should pay the fitter directly.
              Customers paid fitters directly, and   considered to be working for the shop   If you quote an ‘estimated fitting
              United Carpets received no financial   not the customer.  The shop will be   price’, make sure it’s labelled clearly as
              benefit from the fitting services.   responsible for delivering a fitted carpet.   an estimate, not an amount you collect.
                Last, any additional work or     The customer will only deal with the   Commercial and economic reality
              adjustments to fitting costs were   shop, not the fitter. And the shop will   Your invoices, receipts, and website
              arranged directly between the customer   be the principal supplier, and the fitter   should accurately reflect what happens
              and the fitter, without involvement from   a subcontractor (or in some cases an   in practice.
              the store.                         employee).                          For example, if the documentation
              The ‘free fitting’                   In that setup, HMRC would almost   states that the fitters collect their own
              One aspect that did complicate matters   certainly argue there’s a single supply   fees but, in practice, the store collects
              was that United Carpet sometimes   and the retailer would owe VAT on the   these payments, this inconsistency may
              advertised offers of ‘free fitting’.   whole amount (carpet and fitting).  blur the distinction between the two
                The commercial reality was that ‘free   Even where fitters are self-employed,   supplies. As a result, HMRC could argue
              fitting’ was simply a discount on the   if the paperwork and economic   that you are making a single supply,
              carpet. United Carpets did not pay for   and commercial reality suggest the   which would make you liable for VAT on
              the fitting.                       retailer controls the fitting process or   the fitting services.
                For example, a customer might pay   guarantees the work, it may still count   Both your documentation and what
              £2,400 for a carpet with ‘free fitting’.   as a single supply.        actually happens in practice should
              If the fitter’s estimated fee was £240,   The issue extends beyond VAT   show a clear separation between the
              United Carpets would reduce the carpet                                supply of carpet and the fitting services.
              price from £2,000 + VAT (£2,400 total)   considerations. If fitters could be
              to £1,800 + VAT (£2,160 total). This left   deemed to be employees by HMRC,   Review your marketing
              the customer paying the fitter directly   then this may also give rise to PAYE   Phrases such as ‘free fitting’ offers can
              for the installation of £240.      obligations.                       cause confusion. If you use that phrase,
                Invoices issued by United Carpets   How to protect your business    make sure it’s backed by documentation
              would include a note about the     If your business introduces independent   showing it’s really a discount on the
              estimated fitting charge, however this   fitters to customers, rather than   flooring, not a bundled service.
              was not an actual cost and its only   providing fitting services yourself, it   Summary
              purpose was to enable the discount   is essential to ensure that both your   The United Carpets case confirms
              calculation.                       contractual arrangements and the   that retailers can introduce customers
                In some cases, the fitter would charge   commercial reality are clearly defined   to independent fitters without
              a higher amount because of issues with   and consistent.              becoming liable for VAT on fitting
              moving furniture or staircases. Any   Make it clear who does what     services, provided the arrangements
              extra costs were negotiated between                                   are genuinely separate in both their
              the fitter and customer, with no   Your terms and conditions should clearly   contractual terms and their economic
                                                 explain that you sell flooring materials
              involvement of United Carpets.     only, fitting is a separate service   and commercial reality.
              What this means for the trade      supplied by an independent fitter, and   However, the case also highlights
              The United Carpets decision provides   you are not responsible for the standard   how easily that separation can break
              clarity for firms who introduce    of fitting work and your role is only to   down. If the boundaries become blurred
              customers to fitters and who operate   introduce the fitter to the customer.   — for example, if the retailer collects
              with clear separation between the    Customers should know that fitting is   payment for the fitter, sets the fitter’s
              supply of flooring and fitting services.                              prices, or has control over how fitting
              But it also serves as a warning for   provided by independent fitters, and the   work is carried out — HMRC is likely
              businesses where the separation is not   retailer is not responsible for the fitter’s   to challenge the arrangement and
              clear.                             work. United Carpets reinforced this   treat the fitting as part of the retailer’s
                If your setup isn’t properly     message through instore-notices, staff   taxable supply.
              documented, or if you blur the line   explanations, and terms and conditions.   As the tribunal itself put it, it all
              between ‘selling flooring’ and ‘supplying   Keep contacts separate    comes down to the simple but powerful
              fitted flooring’, HMRC could still argue   There should be two distinct   question:
              you’re making a single supply and hit   agreements - one between your   ‘Who is supplying what, and to whom?’
              you with an unexpected VAT bill.   business and the customer (for the   If you can answer that question clearly
              How others could lose in different   goods), and one between the customer   and your paperwork, invoices, and
              circumstances                      and the fitter (for fitting).      day-to-day conduct all reflect the same
              Imagine a carpet shop that advertises   You should not sign or handle the   reality your business will be in a strong
              ‘we’ll fit your carpet for you’, takes the   contract for the fitting services - that’s   position to withstand HMRC scrutiny.  
              full payment (for both carpet and fitting)   between the fitter and the customer.  Autumn Murphy is an ATT technical officer




         66  CFJ April 2026                                                                       www.contractflooringjournal.co.uk
                                                                                                            @CFJMagazine
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71